feat: Prosa ist kein Identifier - Link-Taxonomie als Enum, generierte Regionen mit Markern (4.0.0)
Files changed: - .gitea/workflows/ci.yml - AGENTS.md - CHANGES.md - VERSION - instructions/CONTRACT.md - instructions/link-taxonomy.md - instructions/migrations/4.0.0-link-taxonomy.md - instructions/setup-instance.md - kb/CONTRACT.md - kb/CONVENTIONS.md - kb/CONVENTIONS.md.template - kb/comparisons/COLLECTION.md - kb/concepts/COLLECTION.md - kb/entities/COLLECTION.md - kb/sources/COLLECTION.md - tools/CONTRACT.md - tools/README.md - tools/chemenu/blocks.py - tools/chemenu/cli.py - tools/chemenu/commands/cite_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/commands/dist_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/commands/docs_verify.py - tools/chemenu/commands/doctor.py - tools/chemenu/commands/links_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/commands/migrate_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/commands/new_page.py - tools/chemenu/commands/page_ops.py - tools/chemenu/commands/run_budget.py - tools/chemenu/commands/xref.py - tools/chemenu/conventions.py - tools/chemenu/corpus_diff.py - tools/chemenu/frontmatter_io.py - tools/chemenu/kb_collections.py - tools/chemenu/kb_state.py - tools/chemenu/links.py - tools/chemenu/lint_core.py - tools/chemenu/provenance.py - tools/chemenu/sections.py - tools/chemenu/tests/conftest.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_blocks.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_cite_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_conventions.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_dist_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_doctor.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_migrate_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_new_page.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_pipeline_l0.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_types_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_xref.py - types/concept.schema.yaml - types/entity.md - types/entity.schema.yaml - types/instruction.schema.yaml - types/type-spec.md - work/link-taxonomy-migration/README.md - work/link-taxonomy-migration/plan.md
This commit is contained in:
+23
-16
@@ -39,12 +39,13 @@ tools/
|
||||
errors.py ChemenuError / ValidationError / BackendError
|
||||
corpus_cache.py one parsed corpus per commit, never cached while the tree is dirty
|
||||
kb_scan.py page iteration/loading over kb/
|
||||
blocks.py generated regions in a page body, found by marker rather than by heading
|
||||
links.py labelled edges in `related:` - the graph's semantics as data, not prose
|
||||
kb_collections.py collection discovery (a directory with COLLECTION.md), and what one declares about itself
|
||||
conventions.py kb/CONVENTIONS.md: what this instance decided about authoring, as opposed to what the stack enforces
|
||||
type_resolver.py type-spec loading and schema resolution
|
||||
lint_core.py the lint checks and the report, with no CLI attached
|
||||
types_core.py type-spec listing/description, with no CLI attached
|
||||
sections.py the section headings the tool reads and writes in a page body
|
||||
markdown_code.py masks code spans/fences so a page may show wiki notation, not only use it
|
||||
version.py the stack version: VERSION, the release stamp, the compatibility rule
|
||||
kb_state.py the KB version (.wikitool-kb.json) and the migration chain
|
||||
@@ -111,23 +112,29 @@ procedure written down in advance is one an agent can complete alone. Whether
|
||||
a human *actually* saw it is not enforced here - that question is answered in
|
||||
the eval layer (`evals/trajectory.py`, `clearance-ended-the-turn`).
|
||||
|
||||
**Section names are a vocabulary, not literals - and not the stack's.** `xref add` writes into
|
||||
Relationships and See Also, and `cite add` owns the trailing Footnotes block, so those three
|
||||
headings are structure the tool matches on. *Which words they are* is the corpus's own answer:
|
||||
`conventions.py` reads them from `kb/CONVENTIONS.md`, `sections.py` resolves them on access
|
||||
(PEP 562, the way `config` resolves its paths), and no heading text is written down in Python
|
||||
except the pre-conventions fallback for an instance that has not declared one yet.
|
||||
**Nothing locates a region by its prose.** `xref` owns the links region and `cite` the footnotes
|
||||
region, and each is delimited by a `<!-- wikitool:<name> -->` marker pair (`blocks.py`). The
|
||||
heading inside is rendered from `kb/CONVENTIONS.md` and is replaced along with the rest of the
|
||||
region on every write - so no heading text exists in Python, and changing the declaration cannot
|
||||
split a page.
|
||||
|
||||
Each slot has one canonical spelling - what the tool writes - plus aliases it still recognizes.
|
||||
That asymmetry is what let the wiki be translated page by page instead of atomically: an
|
||||
untranslated `## Relationships` is still found and appended to. Dropping an alias is therefore a
|
||||
breaking change for any page not yet converted, not a cleanup. Renaming a heading is a
|
||||
migration's job; no other command may do it as a side effect (see `cite_block_heading` in
|
||||
`provenance.py`, which exists solely so `cite sync` stays a no-op on an untranslated page).
|
||||
Both halves of that mattered. Matching on the heading made the KB language a compiler constant;
|
||||
*guessing* where the region ended - at the next heading, and before that at the end of the file -
|
||||
silently deleted content sitting after it on eight pages. `migrate verify` compares marker-pair
|
||||
counts for the same reason it compares wikilink counts: a dropped marker is invisible otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
Because the value is resolved rather than bound, nothing may capture it at import time - not a
|
||||
module constant, not an evaluated default argument. That is why `provenance.CITE_BLOCK_HEADING`
|
||||
is a module `__getattr__` and `render_cite_block(heading=None)` resolves inside the call.
|
||||
**A relationship label is data, not prose.** `related:` carries `- <label>: <target>`
|
||||
(`links.py`), the label drawn from `instructions/link-taxonomy.md` and authorised per
|
||||
destination by the *source* collection's `outbound:` block. The body bullet is a rendering of
|
||||
that, which is what removed the need to parse a German phrase back into a relationship - and why
|
||||
the vocabulary can be checked at all, after drifting to 152 distinct labels while it could not
|
||||
be. Both readers accept a bare title as an unlabelled edge: that is the shape a page is in
|
||||
between the machinery landing and the migration reaching it, and `lint` is what reports it.
|
||||
|
||||
**An edge is authored in one direction.** `xref add` writes one, on the asserting page. The
|
||||
inbound view is rendered from the graph rather than stored, so navigation does not depend on
|
||||
anyone writing a mirror - and per-collection authorisation stays coherent, which it cannot be if
|
||||
the tool writes edges into a collection whose rules the author never read.
|
||||
|
||||
**Generated output is never committed.** `reports/`, `.agents/skills/` and
|
||||
`.claude/skills/` are build output; `docs verify` carries canaries in both
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user