docs/explanation: knowledge-and-commitment nennt auch die lange Quelle als Weg in den Großbaum-Ingest; die Commitment-Frage fällt dort nicht immer je Unit (#226)

Files changed:
- docs/explanation/knowledge-and-commitment.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SnAJ7Z3CpVD3PRbN73QtU2

docs/explanation/knowledge-and-commitment.md

@@ -103,9 +103,9 @@ tracker item, never a page; a source that also carries knowledge gets that knowl
 through the ordinary page-creation commands, as a separate step. The two are never one
 transaction the way `new project`'s tracker-then-page order is within a single command - they are
 two independent writes a skill sequences, tracker first, so a failure creating the item leaves no
-page and no promoted source material behind it. That holds for an ordinary source; a source large
+page and no promoted source material behind it. That holds for an ordinary source; a source large,
-or broad enough to run through the large-tree procedure instead promotes ahead of its own
+broad or long enough to run through the large-tree procedure instead promotes ahead of its own
-per-unit commitment decision, because that procedure hands its units through a workshop directory
+commitment decision, because that procedure hands its units through a workshop directory
 that needs them already promoted to address them at all - the same raw-file-without-page state
 the ordinary case avoids becomes, there, the expected condition for as long as the run takes. And
 a failure on the knowledge side afterwards is exactly the ordinary "a source without a page" state