update: u4 (kb/sources) als abgeschlossen dokumentiert - keine Aenderungen noetig

Files changed:
- work/link-taxonomy-migration/README.md
- work/link-taxonomy-migration/glossary.md
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-02 23:00:32 +02:00
parent 8b711f4860
commit 807094deae
2 changed files with 13 additions and 1 deletions
+8
View File
@@ -87,6 +87,14 @@ Deferred edges for later units, discovered while processing systems:
entity-to-concept for authorship. Resolved as `see-also` in every such case on Karpathy's,
Gupta's and Bush's own pages, checked against every register first - not a stretch, a genuine
gap. Worth proposing a label (`originates`/`authored-by`?) if this recurs in u3/u4.
- **`kb/sources/` pages carry no `related:` field either, same as comparisons.**
`types/source.md` declares only `page_ref_fields: [entities, concepts]` - `xref add` refuses
there with the identical "type does not declare a related: field" error. Unlike comparisons,
though, there is nothing left to migrate by hand: every one of the 27 source pages already had
`entities:`/`concepts:` correctly populated via `xref link-source` at ingest time, and their
prose "Verwandte Entities"/"Verwandte Concepts" sections already just mirror those fields -
there was never a labelled-vs-unlabelled distinction to fix here. `migrate verify --from
177c7e9 --path kb/sources` returns 0 findings against baseline. u4 closes with zero page edits.
- **comparisons pages carry no `related:` field at all.** `types/comparison.md` declares only
`entities` (`page_ref_fields: [entities]`) - unlabelled by the schema, like `sources:`. `xref
add`/`xref remove` refuse on this type ("type does not declare a related: field"). The