docs: ausgelieferte Doku zitiert keine Issue-Nummern mehr, docs verify prueft es (schliesst #77)
CI / verify (push) Successful in 59s
Release / release (push) Successful in 37s

Files changed:
- .gitignore
- CHANGES.md
- EVALS.md
- INSTALL.md
- README.md
- VERSION
- docs/pipeline-rationale.md
- instructions/CONTRACT.md
- instructions/bootstrap.md
- instructions/dev/issue-tracking.md
- instructions/evolve-subtypes.md
- instructions/kb-profiles.md
- instructions/mcp-read-server.md
- instructions/wiki-ingest/SKILL.md
- kb/CONTRACT.md
- kb/concepts/COLLECTION.md
- kb/sources/COLLECTION.md
- raw/CONTRACT.md
- tools/.coveragerc
- tools/CONTRACT.md
- tools/README.md
- tools/chemenu/commands/docs_verify.py
- tools/chemenu/tests/test_docs_verify.py
- types/source.schema.yaml
- types/type-spec.md
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-09 18:52:34 +02:00
parent 5820924ffd
commit a51d7a322f
25 changed files with 388 additions and 68 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ in once it grows past the shard threshold, and whether a `layout:` is already de
split it recommends.
A lopsided field is a reason to fix the field, not a reason to leave `layout` off forever -
`source` was exactly this case (Gitea #66): 25 of 29 pages carried one value because the schema
`source` was exactly this case: 25 of 29 pages carried one value because the schema
handed out that value as a *default* whenever nobody chose one, not because the material was
genuinely that uniform. Once the default was removed and the pages reclassified by what they
actually were, the field split into six areas with none of them small. Declare `layout` for