docs: layout comments name all four shipped layout types; #150 changelog pointer and test docstring corrected

Files changed:
- CHANGES.md
- VERSION
- tools/chemenu/commands/new_page.py
- tools/chemenu/tests/test_new_page.py
- tools/chemenu/type_resolver.py

CHANGES.md

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ concern - readable here, never shipped as something to parse.
 
 ---
 
-## 7.1.0-beta.30 - 2026-09-26 - new: concept/source record notes name their layout-computed subdirectory; source usage names its required fields (Gitea #150)
+## 7.1.0-beta.31 - 2026-09-26 - new_page/type_resolver comments no longer claim only entities declare a layout:
 
 **Author:** Torben Nehmer
 
@@ -99,18 +99,27 @@ concern - readable here, never shipped as something to parse.
 - gates.md and a run_budget comment name kb pages by title, not by a path that moved
 - cli.py: removed a stale duplicate help-patch line outside the typer._click fallback's try (Gitea #148)
 - new: concept/source record notes name their layout-computed subdirectory; source usage names its required fields (Gitea #150)
+- new_page/type_resolver comments no longer claim only entities declare a layout:
 <!-- /wikitool:bumps -->
 
+### new_page/type_resolver comments no longer claim only entities declare a layout:
+
+Two code comments - `new_page.py`'s module docstring and `TypeResolver.get_layout`'s - still said
+subtype-driven placement applied to "currently just entities", the same stale assumption behind
+the `new` record's flat `concept`/`source` paths. They now name the four shipped type-specs that
+declare a `layout:`. A test docstring that claimed to run `new source`'s `usage` line verbatim
+now says what the test does: it passes the fields that line names. Comments only.
+
 ### new: concept/source record notes name their layout-computed subdirectory; source usage names its required fields (Gitea #150)
 
-The `new`-command's `cli_contract` record promised `kb/concepts/<Name>.md` and
+`new`'s `cli_contract` record promised `kb/concepts/<Name>.md` and
 `kb/sources/Source - <Name>.md` for the `concept` and `source` variants - flat, with no
 subdirectory. Both type-specs have carried a `layout:` for a while (`concept_type`/`source_type`
 picks the area, same rule an entity or a project already follows), so the actual path is
 `kb/concepts/<subdir>/<Name>.md` and `kb/sources/<subdir>/Source - <Name>.md`. Nothing wrote a
 page to the wrong place - `new` computes the path itself - but the record is exactly what an
 agent reads to find one afterwards, and it was wrong: `instructions/gates.md` named two concept
-pages by their old flat path (fixed above) with the record itself as the plausible source of that
+pages by their old flat path (fixed in the gates.md entry further down) with the record itself as the plausible source of that
 assumption. Both notes now name the subdirectory and where it comes from; `comparison`'s note was
 checked against `types/comparison.md` and left alone; it genuinely has no `layout:`.