SP-Zugriffsweg explizit (access: api/snapshot, #133) und follow_up_at-Korrektur (dueWithTime/dueDay, #135)
CI / verify (push) Successful in 50s
Release / release (push) Successful in 36s

Files changed:
- CHANGES.md
- INSTALL.md
- VERSION
- tools/CONTRACT.md
- tools/chemenu/commands/doctor.py
- tools/chemenu/commands/new_page.py
- tools/chemenu/commands/review_cmd.py
- tools/chemenu/review.py
- tools/chemenu/tasks/__init__.py
- tools/chemenu/tasks/config.py
- tools/chemenu/tasks/protocol.py
- tools/chemenu/tasks/superproductivity.py
- tools/chemenu/tests/test_doctor.py
- tools/chemenu/tests/test_new_page.py
- tools/chemenu/tests/test_review.py
- tools/chemenu/tests/test_superproductivity.py
- tools/chemenu/tests/test_tasks_config.py
This commit is contained in:
torben committed 2026-09-20 20:52:05 +02:00
1 parent 3c1d4cb028
commit e07d1ca42a
17 files changed
+1112 -239

No files matched your search

+4 -4
View File
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ tools/wikitool <command> --help
| `new concept --name "<Name>" --set concept_type=<t> ...` | Scaffold `kb/concepts/<Name>.md` |
| `new source --name "<Name>" --set raw_files=raw/notes/x.md,raw/notes/y.md [--set source_url=<URL>] [--set entities=A,B] [--set concepts=C,D]` | Scaffold `kb/sources/Source - <Name>.md` (prefix added automatically) with a `raw_files:` list (rejects paths that don't exist) |
| `new comparison --name "X vs Y" --set entities=X,Y` | Scaffold `kb/comparisons/X vs Y.md` |
| `new project --name "<Name>" --set responsibility=<bereich> [--resume]` | Scaffold `kb/gtd/<bereich>/<Name>.md` **and**, if `.wikitool-tasks.json` configures a task tracker, a same-named tracker project - one name, one identity. Tracker before page: the tracker side is settled first, so a failure past that point leaves a tracker project with no page - a state `review`'s check 3 already reports - never a page with no tracker project. No tracker configured is a legitimate, explicitly announced state (page only). A name already taken (case-insensitively) in `kb/` or the tracker is refused outright, naming where it was found, and creates nothing. A provider with no write path of its own (Super Productivity has no project-creation endpoint) raises `chemenu.errors.HumanInterventionRequired`; the command shows its instructions and exits **42** (`needs_clearance()`, same posture as the four named gates, without being a fifth one - see that class's docstring), creating nothing. `--resume` is how a later run tells the command a human has done what that message asked: it re-verifies via the read path (`find_project`) before continuing to page creation, rather than trusting the claim, and repeats the same 42 if the tracker still doesn't have it. `--resume` on any other type is refused |
| `new project --name "<Name>" --set responsibility=<bereich> [--resume]` | Scaffold `kb/gtd/<bereich>/<Name>.md` **and**, if `.wikitool-tasks.json` configures a task tracker, a same-named tracker project - one name, one identity. Tracker before page: the tracker side is settled first, so a failure past that point leaves a tracker project with no page - a state `review`'s check 3 already reports - never a page with no tracker project. No tracker configured is a legitimate, explicitly announced state (page only). A name already taken (case-insensitively) in `kb/` or the tracker is refused outright, naming where it was found, and creates nothing. A provider whose *configured access path* has no write path (Super Productivity's `access: "snapshot"` - the tracker is read-only from there by construction) refuses **entirely**, exit **1**, naming the `access: "api"` instance to use instead - neither the tracker project nor the page is created, and `--resume` behaves the same. A provider that could write but has no project-creation endpoint of its own (Super Productivity's `access: "api"` - `GET /projects` exists, `POST /projects` does not) raises `chemenu.errors.HumanInterventionRequired`; the command shows its instructions and exits **42** (`needs_clearance()`, same posture as the four named gates, without being a fifth one - see that class's docstring), creating nothing. `--resume` is how a later run tells the command a human has done what that message asked: it re-verifies via the read path (`find_project`) before continuing to page creation, rather than trusting the claim, and repeats the same 42 if the tracker still doesn't have it. `--resume` on any other type is refused |
| `touch --page "<Title>" [--summary "..."] [--provenance <v>] [--date YYYY-MM-DD] [--set field=value ...] [--add field=value ...] [--remove field=value ...] [--no-date] [--dry-run]` | Update a page's own frontmatter: bump `modified:` and optionally rewrite any field its type declares. `--summary`/`--provenance` are shorthands; `--set` reaches every other field and **replaces** its value, while `--add`/`--remove` change single elements of an array field (removing an absent element succeeds and says so). Repeating `--set` for one array field appends *within the call*, and `\,` is a literal comma - same rules as `new --set`. Refused with the command that owns them instead: `type:` (page-lifecycle), and the page-ref arrays `related:`/`sources:`/`entities:`/`concepts:` (`xref`). Everything else the schema declares is settable, and an unknown field lists what the page actually has. Schema-validates the fields it writes, and `raw_files:` entries must exist on disk. A source declares `date:` instead of `modified:`, and that is the *publication* date of the raw material - it is never bumped to today, and changes only when `--date` names a value explicitly. |
| `rename --from "<Old>" --to "<New>" [--dry-run]` | Rename a page and repoint every reference to it: body `[[wikilinks]]` (aliases and anchors preserved), a `[^cite-id]` whose id was derived from the old title (refreshed to match the new one, both in its Footnotes definition and every reference to it), the page's own H1, and every page-ref frontmatter array declared by the type's `page_ref_fields:`. If `--from` is *not* a page but is referenced, it instead repoints those references onto the existing `--to` page and moves nothing - the fix for a reference spelled `act_runner` when the page is `Act Runner` |
| `rm --page "<Title>" [--yes] [--dry-run]` | Delete a page and mechanically de-link it. Refuses without `--yes` while other pages still reference it. Strips ref-array entries and bare `- [[Title]]` / `- **label:** [[Title]]` bullets; leaves prose and inline citations in place and reports them |
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ tools/wikitool <command> --help
|---------|---------|
| `lint [--json] [--markdown out.md] [--full] [--fail-on-error]` | Structural + provenance checks: broken wikilinks, dangling frontmatter references, orphan pages, index drift, schema gaps, duplicate titles, title mismatches, pages nested more than one directory below their collection (hard - the generated catalog folds these into their area silently rather than merely reading it), uncovered raw files, broken `raw_files:` refs, raw files claimed by more than one source page, unmarked provenance, citation/frontmatter drift, unbalanced generated-region markers, edges whose label is missing or not authorised by the source collection's `outbound:` (both hard once `kb_version` has reached the release that introduced labelled edges - advisory below it, so a corpus mid-migration is not refused by the check measuring it), `see-also` edges whose reverse direction already carries a specific label (advisory only - redundant rather than wrong, and never migration-gated, since no version turns the redundancy into an error), a collection past the catalog's per-area shard threshold that has no areas to shard (advisory only - sharding is automatic but per *area*, so a collection nobody gave areas keeps one table however large it grows; reported with the split its subtype field would produce, and only when that split puts every resulting area at or under the threshold, so a lopsided or small collection stays silent), source pages sitting in the `unclassified` catalog slot (advisory only - `unclassified` is the visible fallback for a genuinely unclear source, not a defect), quote-limit overages (>2 blockquoted lines/page, advisory only). Prints only the sections that found something and always writes the full report to `reports/Lint Report <date>.md` (or `--markdown`), naming the path - `--full` prints everything, `--json` prints the findings and writes nothing |
| `search ["<text>"] [--field <predicate> ...] [--kind/--subtype/--collection/--tag <v>] [--regex] [--limit N] [--sort [-]<field>] [--backend <name>] [--matches] [--json]` | Find pages in `kb/` without reading the index. Text search runs through a pluggable backend (`rg` today); `--field` predicates are evaluated on frontmatter - `f=v`, `f~substring`, `'f>=v'`, `'f:*'` (present), `'!f'` (absent), repeatable and ANDed. With no text this is a pure structured query. One hit per line, ` | `-separated as `score \| kind/subtype \| title \| path \| summary`, so a hit can be judged without opening the page and then opened without looking it up: **title and path are never truncated** (the title is the identifier `touch`/`xref`/`cite` take), and the summary - the one lossy field, and the only one that may contain the separator - goes last, so splitting on `" \| "` with `maxsplit=4` is unambiguous. Scope is pages: the backend walks `kb/` but drops anything `kb_scan.iter_kb_pages` excludes (the kb-root meta files, every `COLLECTION.md`, every generated `INDEX.md`), which is why a hand-run grep over `kb/` can add none of them but those. `--limit` defaults to 50 (`0` for no limit) and **a truncated result says so** - `50 of 182 result(s)` in the table, `total`/`truncated`/`limit` beside `count` in `--json`, where `count` stays the number of results in the payload; the same default and the same fields are what `api.search` and the MCP `search` tool carry, from one constant. A page whose frontmatter does not parse can match no positive predicate, so it is **named** rather than dropped: `--json` always carries an `unreadable` list of `{path, reason}` (usually empty), and the table form writes the same lines to stderr. `--regex` is applied by `rg` alone, whose engine is linear; the ranking boosts for title and summary are literal-containment only, so a non-literal pattern is ranked by match count. `rg` is killed after 30 s and reported as a failure. Read-only, and **exempt from the Iteration Budget Gate** |
| `review [--json]` | The GTD weekly review: joins the configured task-tracker provider (`chemenu.tasks`) against `kb/gtd/` project pages over the case-normalized project name, at read time, storing nothing - not even a `reports/` file. Five checks: **stalled** (a tracker project with zero open items whose `kb/` page is `state: active` - `dormant`/`completed`/`abandoned` never fire, since those states mean the initiative not having a next action is expected rather than a problem), **waiting-overdue** (a `WAITING` item whose `follow_up_at` is older than `thresholds.stalled_waiting_days`), **unpaged-project** (a tracker project with no matching `kb/` page, older than `thresholds.unpaged_project_weeks`), **no-open-loop** (a `kb/` page `state: active` with no matching tracker project, or one with zero open items - the reverse direction of the unpaged-project join, so a rename on either side surfaces on both), **someday-stale** (a someday/maybe item untouched for longer than `thresholds.someday_stale_months`). Thresholds come from `.wikitool-tasks.json`, never from the schema. Text output is one `[check] project: message` line per finding; `--json` carries the same findings plus `checks_run`/`checks_skipped`/`kb_project_count`/`complete`. No `.wikitool-tasks.json` fails immediately with a clear "no tracker configured" message; a provider that cannot be reached mid-run degrades only the checks that needed the failing call, and the report is never rendered as if it were complete - see its error-contract row. Read-only, and **exempt from the Iteration Budget Gate** |
| `review [--json]` | The GTD weekly review: joins the configured task-tracker provider (`chemenu.tasks`) against `kb/gtd/` project pages over the case-normalized project name, at read time, storing nothing - not even a `reports/` file. Five checks: **stalled** (a tracker project with zero open items whose `kb/` page is `state: active` - `dormant`/`completed`/`abandoned` never fire, since those states mean the initiative not having a next action is expected rather than a problem), **waiting-overdue** (a `WAITING` item whose `follow_up_at` is older than `thresholds.stalled_waiting_days`), **unpaged-project** (a tracker project with no matching `kb/` page, older than `thresholds.unpaged_project_weeks`), **no-open-loop** (a `kb/` page `state: active` with no matching tracker project, or one with zero open items - the reverse direction of the unpaged-project join, so a rename on either side surfaces on both), **someday-stale** (a someday/maybe item untouched for longer than `thresholds.someday_stale_months`). Thresholds come from `.wikitool-tasks.json`, never from the schema. Text output is one `[check] project: message` line per finding, preceded by a `Source:` line naming which access path answered and, for `superproductivity`'s `access: "snapshot"`, the snapshot's age; `--json` carries the same findings plus `checks_run`/`checks_skipped`/`kb_project_count`/`complete`/`source` (`{"kind": ..., "detail": ...}` or `null`). No `.wikitool-tasks.json` fails immediately with a clear "no tracker configured" message; a provider that cannot be reached mid-run degrades only the checks that needed the failing call, and the report is never rendered as if it were complete - see its error-contract row. Read-only, and **exempt from the Iteration Budget Gate** |
### Provenance
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ tools/wikitool <command> --help
| Command | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `doctor [--json]` | Check that this instance is correctly configured: dependencies (Python, ripgrep), author resolution, stack version, git identity/branch/remote, published skills, kb/raw/reports/work/instructions structure, personalization (`USER.md`/`SOUL.md` present **and** filled - a file still carrying the template's sentinel is a `FAIL`, since a renamed template is not a filled one), the KB conventions (`kb/CONVENTIONS.md` present, unsentinelled, and naming all three tool-owned section headings - a `FAIL` on any of the three, because `xref`/`cite` write out of it), the environment note (`ENVIRONMENT.md` - optional, so absent is `OK`; a still-templated one is a `WARN`), generated files, whether the MCP `submit` tool is armed (`.wikitool-upload.json` present/absent/malformed, its limits, and how many submissions are waiting in `mcp-upload/` - absent is `OK` and means the write path does not exist at all, malformed is the one `FAIL` here, since a broken opt-in must not silently disable the limits it exists to enforce), the task-tracker provider (`.wikitool-tasks.json` present/absent/malformed - absent is `OK` and means no tracker is configured, malformed is `FAIL` for the same reason the upload opt-in is; for a configured `superproductivity` provider, also whether its read path (a backup snapshot) is ready and whether its local REST API answers `GET /health` right now - neither ever `FAIL`s, an app that is simply not running is not a fault), the session id source (`OK` for `WIKITOOL_SESSION_ID` or a registered harness variable, `WARN` only for the bare parent-pid fallback - see `chemenu.session`), and telemetry state (on/off, why - installation-form default, `.wikitool-telemetry.json`, or `WIKI_TRACE` - and the current session count/byte total against both caps; never `FAIL`, see [EVALS.md](../EVALS.md)). Read-only, exit 1 only on a `FAIL` (a missing remote, session id, or `VERSION` is a `WARN`, not a fault). Exempt from the Iteration Budget Gate |
| `doctor [--json]` | Check that this instance is correctly configured: dependencies (Python, ripgrep), author resolution, stack version, git identity/branch/remote, published skills, kb/raw/reports/work/instructions structure, personalization (`USER.md`/`SOUL.md` present **and** filled - a file still carrying the template's sentinel is a `FAIL`, since a renamed template is not a filled one), the KB conventions (`kb/CONVENTIONS.md` present, unsentinelled, and naming all three tool-owned section headings - a `FAIL` on any of the three, because `xref`/`cite` write out of it), the environment note (`ENVIRONMENT.md` - optional, so absent is `OK`; a still-templated one is a `WARN`), generated files, whether the MCP `submit` tool is armed (`.wikitool-upload.json` present/absent/malformed, its limits, and how many submissions are waiting in `mcp-upload/` - absent is `OK` and means the write path does not exist at all, malformed is the one `FAIL` here, since a broken opt-in must not silently disable the limits it exists to enforce), the task-tracker provider (`.wikitool-tasks.json` present/absent/malformed - absent is `OK` and means no tracker is configured, malformed is `FAIL` for the same reason the upload opt-in is; for a configured `superproductivity` provider, also its configured `access` path's own state - `access: "api"` reports whether its local REST API answers `GET /health` right now, `access: "snapshot"` reports whether a backup file is ready; the *other* access path is never attempted and is not a finding - and neither ever `FAIL`s, an app that is simply not running is not a fault), the session id source (`OK` for `WIKITOOL_SESSION_ID` or a registered harness variable, `WARN` only for the bare parent-pid fallback - see `chemenu.session`), and telemetry state (on/off, why - installation-form default, `.wikitool-telemetry.json`, or `WIKI_TRACE` - and the current session count/byte total against both caps; never `FAIL`, see [EVALS.md](../EVALS.md)). Read-only, exit 1 only on a `FAIL` (a missing remote, session id, or `VERSION` is a `WARN`, not a fault). Exempt from the Iteration Budget Gate |
## Design notes
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ is atomic, and whether a retry is safe.
| Command | Exit 1 means | Atomic? | Retry policy |
|---------|--------------|---------|--------------|
| `new <type>` | Duplicate page title, unknown type, invalid `--set` value, or a `raw_files` path that doesn't exist | Yes - single file write | Not transient; fix the argument and retry once. Never hand-craft the page instead |
| `new project` | Everything `new <type>` covers, **plus**: the name is already taken in the tracker (case-insensitively), or `--resume` was passed for a type other than `project` | **No** for the tracker-configured case - a tracker-project write (or its human-clearance request) happens before the kb/ page write, so a failure between the two leaves a tracker project with no page (a state `review`'s check 3 already reports), never a page with no tracker project. Still a single file write when no tracker is configured | A collision or a bad `--set` is not transient, same as `new <type>`. **Exit 42** (`NEEDS USER CLEARANCE`, not exit 1) is its own third outcome: the provider cannot create the project itself and a human must, per the printed instructions; re-run with `--resume` once that is done - it re-verifies via the read path rather than trusting the claim, and exits 42 again unchanged if the tracker still does not have it |
| `new project` | Everything `new <type>` covers, **plus**: the name is already taken in the tracker (case-insensitively), `--resume` was passed for a type other than `project`, or the configured provider's access path has no write path at all (Super Productivity's `access: "snapshot"`) | **No** for the tracker-configured case - a tracker-project write (or its human-clearance request) happens before the kb/ page write, so a failure between the two leaves a tracker project with no page (a state `review`'s check 3 already reports), never a page with no tracker project. Still a single file write when no tracker is configured | A collision, a bad `--set`, or a read-only access path is not transient, same as `new <type>` - the last of those points at the `access: "api"` instance instead and refuses on every `--resume` retry too, since nothing about the config changes by asking again. **Exit 42** (`NEEDS USER CLEARANCE`, not exit 1) is its own separate outcome from the ordinary exit-1 cases above: the provider *can* write but cannot create the project itself and a human must, per the printed instructions; re-run with `--resume` once that is done - it re-verifies via the read path rather than trusting the claim, and exits 42 again unchanged if the tracker still does not have it |
| `touch` | Page not found; an invalid value for a field it writes; a field owned by another command (`type:`, a page-ref array) or absent from the type's schema; `--add`/`--remove` on a non-array field; a `raw_files:` path that doesn't exist | Yes - single file write, and every refusal happens before it | Fix the argument and retry once. Safe to re-run as-is: `--set` and `--add` are idempotent, and `--remove` of an already-absent element succeeds while reporting it |
| `rename` | Neither `--from` nor `--to` is a page, target title already taken, or `--from` equals `--to` | No - one write per referencing page, then the file move | Safe to retry once as-is; each page's rewrite is idempotent. Use `--dry-run` first to see the blast radius. Never fix up references by hand instead |
| `rm` | Page not found, **or** other pages still reference it and `--yes` was not passed | No - one write per referencing page, then the delete | For "still referenced": show the user the inbound list, get approval, then re-run with `--yes`. Prose references it reports afterwards are an editorial fix, not a retry |