chemenu/types/type-spec.md

type, name, description, schema

type	name	description	schema
types/type-spec.md	type-spec	Authoring and validation contract for path-valued Chemenu type specifications	types/type-spec.schema.yaml

Type spec

A type-spec doc is the authoring and validation contract for one Chemenu artifact type. Artifact frontmatter stores the repo-relative path to this doc in type:, and this file serves several consumers differently: an author writing a new instance reads it for what to write, someone unfamiliar with the type reads it for what to expect from an instance before opening one, and the validator and the type-conformance reviewer read it to check conformance.

Required Frontmatter

• type: types/type-spec.md. The root type spec is self-referential and uses the same value.
• name: short human-facing type name. This is also the type's logical "kind" - tooling resolves an instance's type: path to this name instead of hardcoding a type-path-to-kind mapping.
• description: retrieval description for the type contract.
• schema: repo-relative path to the .schema.yaml file that validates artifacts of this type, or null when the type has no schema.
• subtype_field (optional): the frontmatter field name on instances of this type that carries a subtype/category (e.g. entity_type), or omitted if this type has no such field.

Validation Contract

Two systems check conformance to a type:

• The deterministic validator checks the symbolic half: frontmatter fields, enums, path patterns, and syntactic body shape (required headings, section counts, date formats) — whatever the named .schema.yaml can statically specify. It parses structure; it never judges meaning.
• The type-conformance review gate checks the semantic half: everything about an instance that is not mechanically checkable — a description's routing quality, a title's claim-shape, whether the body's claims hold up — judged against this file's body, read as natural-language authoring instructions applied by an LLM reviewer.

Do not restate a schema rule in body text. The validator already enforces it, so the restatement adds no protection — it only spends the reviewer's judgment re-confirming something already guaranteed, instead of on the properties only a reviewer can check.

Writing Shape

• Write the body as a content contract: checkable properties of a conforming instance, in a form the type-conformance gate can apply directly. Prefer "what a conforming instance contains or claims" over "how to produce one" — production process is invisible to the reviewer, so it belongs in a skill or instruction, linked rather than embedded.
• State what the type is for and when an author should choose it over a neighboring type.
• Document the frontmatter fields (required and optional) as a reference for authors; the schema is the sole source of truth for requiredness.
• When schema is non-null and implies body structure beyond type/name/description, include a ## Template an authoring agent can copy.

The type layer

types/ is the repo's global type surface: one set of type-specs serving every collection under kb/. It is deliberately not a collection and carries no COLLECTION.md — there is no per-collection type surface, and tools/wikitool docs verify fails if a contract appears here.

Quality goal: a type-spec is the single source of truth for its type. No structural fact about a page type may be restated anywhere else — not in AGENTS.md, not in a skill, not in Python. Adding a type must require no code change.

Anatomy of a type

Each type is two files:

File	Owns
types/<name>.md	The authoring contract: when to use the type, when not to, guidance, and the ## Template block used to scaffold new pages
types/<name>.schema.yaml	The machine-checkable half: fields, types, enums, defaults, required-ness, additionalProperties: false

This file is the self-referential root contract that both are validated against.

Placement frontmatter

Beyond the required fields above, a type-spec declares where its instances are written. Never choose a directory by hand - root plus base_dir plus layout decide placement, and tools/wikitool new writes the file.

Field	Required	Use
base_dir	Yes for instantiable types	Directory where instances are written, e.g. entities. Relative to the root named by root:
root	No	Which root base_dir resolves against: kb (default, config.KB_DIR) or repo (config.ROOT)
layout	No	Maps each subtype to its dir and index title
title_prefix	No	Prepended to the page title, e.g. Source -
page_ref_fields	No	Fields whose entries are page titles, e.g. [related, sources]. lint checks they resolve; rename/rm rewrite them

root: kb is the default because it is what every knowledge type wants, and because keeping placement kb-relative is what lets a test point config.KB_DIR at a fixture and be certain nothing can write into the real kb/. root: repo is opt-in, for types whose artifacts are legitimately not knowledge: instruction is the worked example - an agent-directed procedure under instructions/, outside the raw/ -> kb/ provenance rules entirely.

A type-spec without base_dir is a contract only and cannot be instantiated; wikitool new <name> refuses it. lint-report is the worked example: its artifacts are generated into reports/, so it describes a file format without owning a place anything writes to.

Adding a type

1. Write types/<name>.md with the frontmatter above and a ## Template fenced block.
2. Write types/<name>.schema.yaml declaring every field, with additionalProperties: false.
3. Confirm it is discovered: tools/wikitool types list, then tools/wikitool types describe <name>.
4. Scaffold with tools/wikitool new <name> --name "..." --set field=value.

No Python change is needed at any step; wikitool discovers types by scanning this directory.

Template variables

The ## Template block is filled from the page's own frontmatter, plus {name} and {today}. Filters render structured fields: {entities|bullets}, {tags|join}, {entity_type|capitalize}, {entities|table_header}, {entities|table_sep}, {entities|table_cells}. {field|literal text} falls back to the literal when the field is absent.

Ownership boundary

Owned here	Owned by kb/CONTRACT.md and the collection contracts
Frontmatter fields, enums, defaults, required-ness	Quality goal and tone
Directory placement and title prefix	Naming conventions
Body skeleton (template)	Linking policy and relationship vocabulary
When to use / not use this type	Provenance and confidence practice

If a rule would be identical for every type, it belongs in kb/CONTRACT.md, not in a type-spec. If it is identical for every page in one collection, it belongs in that collection's COLLECTION.md.

What does not belong here

• Page instances. Nothing under types/ is content.
• A COLLECTION.md. types/ is a framework surface, not a collection.
• Anything already enforced by a .schema.yaml restated in prose as if it were separately authoritative.

Template

---
type: types/type-spec.md
name: {type-name}
description: "{Retrieval description for this type contract}"
schema: {types/{type-name}.schema.yaml or null}
---

# {Type name}

{What this type is for, and when to choose it over a neighboring type.}

## Frontmatter

| Field | Required | Use |
|---|---:|---|
| `type` | Yes | `{this type spec's own repo path}` |
| `name` | Yes | {short human-facing type name} |
| `description` | Yes | {retrieval description for instances of this type} |
| `schema` | Yes | {repo-relative path to schema.yaml or null} |

## Template

```markdown
{a copyable frontmatter + body skeleton matching the schema}
```

---

Relevant Notes:

• This is the root type-spec that all other type-specs reference
• Type-specs form the structural backbone of the wiki's type system
• All validation flows through type-spec definitions