177c7e9ce8
Files changed: - .gitea/workflows/ci.yml - AGENTS.md - CHANGES.md - VERSION - instructions/CONTRACT.md - instructions/link-taxonomy.md - instructions/migrations/4.0.0-link-taxonomy.md - instructions/setup-instance.md - kb/CONTRACT.md - kb/CONVENTIONS.md - kb/CONVENTIONS.md.template - kb/comparisons/COLLECTION.md - kb/concepts/COLLECTION.md - kb/entities/COLLECTION.md - kb/sources/COLLECTION.md - tools/CONTRACT.md - tools/README.md - tools/chemenu/blocks.py - tools/chemenu/cli.py - tools/chemenu/commands/cite_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/commands/dist_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/commands/docs_verify.py - tools/chemenu/commands/doctor.py - tools/chemenu/commands/links_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/commands/migrate_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/commands/new_page.py - tools/chemenu/commands/page_ops.py - tools/chemenu/commands/run_budget.py - tools/chemenu/commands/xref.py - tools/chemenu/conventions.py - tools/chemenu/corpus_diff.py - tools/chemenu/frontmatter_io.py - tools/chemenu/kb_collections.py - tools/chemenu/kb_state.py - tools/chemenu/links.py - tools/chemenu/lint_core.py - tools/chemenu/provenance.py - tools/chemenu/sections.py - tools/chemenu/tests/conftest.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_blocks.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_cite_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_conventions.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_dist_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_doctor.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_migrate_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_new_page.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_pipeline_l0.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_types_cmd.py - tools/chemenu/tests/test_xref.py - types/concept.schema.yaml - types/entity.md - types/entity.schema.yaml - types/instruction.schema.yaml - types/type-spec.md - work/link-taxonomy-migration/README.md - work/link-taxonomy-migration/plan.md
64 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
profile: comparisons
|
|
outbound:
|
|
any: [compares-with, contrasts, see-also]
|
|
required_by_stack: false
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# kb/comparisons/ - Collection Contract
|
|
|
|
Structured head-to-head evaluations of two or more things that already have pages here. A
|
|
comparison exists so that neither subject's own page has to argue against the other.
|
|
|
|
**Quality goal:** decidability - a reader with a concrete situation should be able to choose.
|
|
That needs named, checkable dimensions and a stated trade-off; a page that lists differences
|
|
without saying what they cost has described, not compared.
|
|
|
|
Inherits [kb/CONTRACT.md](../CONTRACT.md) for the rules the stack enforces - linking mechanics,
|
|
provenance, citation, the confidence machinery - and
|
|
[kb/CONVENTIONS.md](../CONVENTIONS.md) for what this instance decided: language, naming forms,
|
|
tone, relationship labels, the confidence rubric. Neither is restated here.
|
|
|
|
## Types offered
|
|
|
|
`comparison` (`tools/wikitool types describe comparison`).
|
|
|
|
## Naming
|
|
|
|
The title form is [kb/CONVENTIONS.md § Naming](../CONVENTIONS.md#naming)'s. What is local here
|
|
is the ordering: name the subjects as they are most commonly spoken together, not
|
|
alphabetically.
|
|
|
|
## Requirements
|
|
|
|
- **Every subject must already have its own page.** A comparison is a view over existing
|
|
knowledge, not a place to introduce it. Create the entity or concept pages first, then
|
|
compare them.
|
|
- Compare on stated, checkable dimensions - a table with one row per dimension, one column per
|
|
subject. Cite hard facts the same way any other page does.
|
|
- State the trade-off, not a winner. Where a recommendation is genuinely warranted, scope it:
|
|
"for X workload", not "better".
|
|
|
|
## Authorised labels
|
|
|
|
The `outbound:` block above is what `wikitool lint` and `xref add` check: which labels a page in
|
|
this collection may use, per destination. The catalogue they are drawn from - and what each one
|
|
asserts - is [instructions/link-taxonomy.md](../../instructions/link-taxonomy.md), which binds
|
|
nothing on its own.
|
|
|
|
Narrow for the opposite reason: a comparison's substance is its table, and its links to the compared subjects are the one relationship it asserts.
|
|
|
|
Adding a label here is a deliberate contract change, not a way around a refusal.
|
|
|
|
## Outbound linking
|
|
|
|
A comparison links to every subject with `compares-with`. The subjects do not have to link back:
|
|
a comparison is reached through the catalog, and each subject's inbound view renders the edge
|
|
anyway. Comparison pages are **exempt from the orphan check** for the same reason.
|
|
|
|
## What does not belong here
|
|
|
|
- A comparison of things this wiki does not otherwise cover.
|
|
- Feature-matrix dumps copied from a vendor page. If the material is a source, ingest it as one
|
|
and compile the comparison from it.
|